Legal Opinion

State v. Aiken

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided September 23, 2004No. 03-126PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶ 1. Defendant Alvin Aiken appeals his conviction for grossly negligent operation of a motor vehicle. Defendant claims that the trial court erred by advising the jury, in response to a jury question during deliberations, that the gross negligence charge did not refer to the specific conduct described in the information, but rather to defendant’s conduct generally while operating his vehicle on the day in question. We reverse and remand.

¶ 2. Defendant’s conviction arose from his encounter with state game wardens George Scribner and Robert Lutz. During the evening of August 29, 2002, the game…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. ChristmanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1977
  2. State v. TurnerSupreme Court of Vermont · 2003
  3. State v. McKeenSupreme Court of Vermont · 1996
  4. State v. BriggsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1989
  5. State v. BurclaffSupreme Court of Vermont · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. NeisnerSupreme Court of Vermont · 2010
  2. State v. DesautelsSupreme Court of Vermont · 2006
  3. State v. JacksonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008
  4. State v. AmsdenSupreme Court of Vermont · 2013
  5. State v. BrownSupreme Court of Vermont · 2005

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API