Legal Opinion

State v. Christman

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided February 1, 1977No. 212-75PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLarrow, J.

Appellant was convicted below, under an information amended during trial at the close of the State’s case, of violating 13 V.S.A. § 3705(c), relating to unlawful trespass, by entering a residence knowing she was not licensed or privileged to do so. She appeals that conviction, claiming that the amendment, made at the suggestion of the trial judge, severely-prejudiced her constitutional right to know the precise charge against her and deprived her of opportunity to intelligently prepare a defense. She seeks reversal of the judgment of guilty, claiming that the charge she was prepared to defend…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. DebrowSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. State v. WoodmanseeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1964
  3. State v. MargieSupreme Court of Vermont · 1956
  4. State v. LeboSupreme Court of Vermont · 1971

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. State v. StanislawSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
  2. State v. BreanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1978
  3. State v. RamsaySupreme Court of Vermont · 1985
  4. In re R.M.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1988
  5. State v. SimsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API