State v. Christman
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtLarrow, J.
Appellant was convicted below, under an information amended during trial at the close of the State’s case, of violating 13 V.S.A. § 3705(c), relating to unlawful trespass, by entering a residence knowing she was not licensed or privileged to do so. She appeals that conviction, claiming that the amendment, made at the suggestion of the trial judge, severely-prejudiced her constitutional right to know the precise charge against her and deprived her of opportunity to intelligently prepare a defense. She seeks reversal of the judgment of guilty, claiming that the charge she was prepared to defend…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. DebrowSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- State v. WoodmanseeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1964
- State v. MargieSupreme Court of Vermont · 1956
- State v. LeboSupreme Court of Vermont · 1971
3Cited by28 opinions
- State v. StanislawSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
- State v. BreanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1978
- State v. RamsaySupreme Court of Vermont · 1985
- In re R.M.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1988
- State v. SimsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.