Legal Opinion

LAPENSOHN v. HUDSON CITY SAVINGS BANK

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided August 13, 2020No. 2:20-cv-00680Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA HOWARD C. LAPENSOBMN, et al., : Plaintiffs, : V. Civil No. 2:20-cv-00680-JMG HUDSON CITY SAVINGS BANK, e¢ al., Defendants. : MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiffs allege that they suffered damages after a water pipe burst in their residence, a home from which they refused to vacate after foreclosure and ejectment proceedings were decided against them in state court. Plaintiffs contend that M&T Bank (“the bank’), which obtained insurance on the home as its legal owner, and the bank’s insurer, Voyager, as well as Parker…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
  4. Skinner v. SwitzerSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  5. Frederico v. Home DepotCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API