Oxford House at Yale v. Gilligan

Opinion

DiPENTIMA, C. J.

In this procedurally unusual case, the defendant, Vincent Gilligan, appeals from the judgment of the trial court rendered in his favor dismissing the plaintiffs summary process action. On appeal, the defendant claims that the court improperly (1) permitted the plaintiff to prevail on a claim that was not pleaded and that was introduced after the close of evidence, and (2) concluded that the plaintiff is exempt from the summary process statutes as a service providing institution pursuant to the exception enumerated in General Statutes § 47a-2 (a) (1). Because we agree…