Legal Opinion

Continental Nat. Bank v. Heilman

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided April 4, 1898No. 451PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Indiana.

1Opinion of the Court

WOODS, Circuit Judge.

The bill in this case was brought against the widow and children of William Heilman, deceased, to charge them, as legatees or devisees, with the amount due upon a promissory note for $100,000 alleged to have been executed by the deceased, jointly with David J. Mackey, to the appellant, the Continental National Bank. Alfred W. Emory was made a party defendant because he holds property left by the deceased as the trustee for the other defendants. Mackey was also made a party, but was let out on his demurrer to the bill. Issue was joined upon voluminous answers, of which no…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Borer v. ChapmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. McBlair v. GibbesSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
  3. Board of Public Works v. Columbia CollegeSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  4. Morgan v. HamletSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  5. People ex rel. Sexton v. BrooksIllinois Supreme Court · 1887

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hale v. CoffinCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1903
  2. Humphreys v. WalshCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1918
  3. Dunscomb v. Chicago, B. & Q. R.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1917
  4. Union Trust Co. v. ShoemakerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1912
  5. Schurmeier v. Connecticut Mut. Life Ins.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API