Legal Opinion

Humphreys v. Walsh

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided February 19, 1918No. 2294PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of New Jersey; Thos. G. Haight, Judge. Suit by Edward W. Humphreys against Julia M. Walsh and another. From a decree dismissing the bill, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

WOOLLEY, Circuit Judge.

The question in this case concerns the defense of laches in an equity action as affected by a state statute of limitations, which, if applicable by analogy, purports to save the right of action throughout the non-residence of the defendants. The case is before us on appeal from a decree, whereby the District Court, disregarding the statute, dismissed the bill on the ground of laches. The averments of tire bill are in substance as follows:

In 1882, Edward Walsh, Jr., gave Solon Humphreys his promissory note for $42,825.65, payable six months after date. In 1900, Solon…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Galliher v. CadwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Plumley v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. Patterson v. HewittSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  4. Kirby v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  5. Alsop v. RikerSupreme Court of the United States · 1894

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Tilden v. BarberDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1920
  2. Anglo-Colombian Development Co. v. StapletonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1927
  3. Banker v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API