Legal Opinion
Clyde v. Human Rights Commission
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided December 20, 1990No. 4-90-0156PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Knecht
The Illinois Department of Human Rights filed a complaint on behalf of Leon Clyde, complainant, against Caterpillar, Inc., alleging Caterpillar violated section 2 — 102(A) of the Illinois Human Rights Act (Act) (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1987, ch. 68, par. 2 — 102(A)). The administrative law judge (ALJ) found, as a matter of law, complainant failed to establish a prima facie case of discrimination on the basis of age. (In re H. Leon Clyde (May 9, 1989),_Ill. Hum. Rights Comm’n Rep. _(HRC No. 1986 — CF—1103) (hereinafter ALJ’s recommended decision of May 9, 1989).) The Illinois Human Rights Commission…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States Postal Service Board of Governors v. AikensSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Zaderaka v. Illinois Human Rights CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Marinelli v. Human Rights CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
- Interstate Material Corp. v. Human Rights CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
- Roedl v. Midco InternationalAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
- Southern Illinois Clinic, Ltd. v. Human Rights CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
- Illinois J. Livingston Co. v. Human Rights CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.