Legal Opinion
Interstate Material Corp. v. Human Rights Commission
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided August 25, 1995No. 1-93-0920PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gordon
On June 9, 1986, and June 11, 1986, respondents, Donald Brandy and William Thomas, respectively, filed charges with the Illinois Department of Human Rights alleging purposeful discrimination by Interstate Material Corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Interstate,” in violation of sections 2 — 102(A) and 6 — 101(A) of the Illinois Human Rights Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1985, ch. 68, pars. 2 — 102(A), 6 — 101(A)). They alleged that Interstate discriminated against them because of their race when it laid them off while retaining others less senior but of a different race and also alleged that…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States Postal Service Board of Governors v. AikensSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Castaneda v. PartidaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- McQueen v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2011
- Kalush v. Department of Human Rights Chief Legal CounselAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
- Department of Corrections v. Human Rights CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
- Illinois J. Livingston Co. v. Human Rights CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
- Toledo v. Human Rights CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.