Legal Opinion

Roedl v. Midco International

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 29, 1998No. 5-97-0481PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hopkins

Charles J. Roedl, complainant, appeals from a decision of the chief legal counsel of the Illinois Department of Human Rights (the Department) sustaining the Department’s dismissal of complainant’s charge of age discrimination against his former employer, Midco International (Midco), for lack of substantial evidence. On direct appeal to this court, pursuant to section 8 — 111(A)(1) of the Illinois Human Rights Act (775 ILCS 5/8 — 111(A)(1) (West 1996)), complainant argues that the chief legal counsel erred in sustaining the Department’s dismissal because the Department failed to consider all…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Zaderaka v. Illinois Human Rights CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Marinelli v. Human Rights CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  3. Whipple v. Department of Rehabilitation ServicesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
  4. Clyde v. Human Rights CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
  5. Southern Illinois Clinic, Ltd. v. Human Rights CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Folbert v. Department of Human RightsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  2. Allen v. LiebermanAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
  3. Illinois J. Livingston Co. v. Human Rights CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
  4. Owens v. Department of Human RightsAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
  5. Cooper v. BombelaDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1999

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API