Roedl v. Midco International
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hopkins
Charles J. Roedl, complainant, appeals from a decision of the chief legal counsel of the Illinois Department of Human Rights (the Department) sustaining the Department’s dismissal of complainant’s charge of age discrimination against his former employer, Midco International (Midco), for lack of substantial evidence. On direct appeal to this court, pursuant to section 8 — 111(A)(1) of the Illinois Human Rights Act (775 ILCS 5/8 — 111(A)(1) (West 1996)), complainant argues that the chief legal counsel erred in sustaining the Department’s dismissal because the Department failed to consider all…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Zaderaka v. Illinois Human Rights CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
- Marinelli v. Human Rights CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
- Whipple v. Department of Rehabilitation ServicesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
- Clyde v. Human Rights CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
- Southern Illinois Clinic, Ltd. v. Human Rights CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
3Cited by11 opinions
- Folbert v. Department of Human RightsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
- Allen v. LiebermanAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
- Illinois J. Livingston Co. v. Human Rights CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
- Owens v. Department of Human RightsAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
- Cooper v. BombelaDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1999
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.