United States v. Trapilo
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MESKILL, Circuit Judge:
This appeal presents the question whether a scheme to defraud the Canadian government of tax revenue is cognizable under the federal wire fraud statute, 18 U.S.C. § 1343. In addressing that issue, the district court adopted the reasoning of the First Circuit in *549United States v. Boots, 80 F.3d 580 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 263, 136 L.Ed.2d 188 (1996), and concluded that the common law “revenue rule” and other prudential considerations precluded application of the federal wire fraud statute in alleged schemes to defraud foreign governments of tax…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- McNally v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Chapman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. WiltbergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1820
- United States v. FeolaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Pasquantino v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- United States v. Lyle David Pierce, Iii, A/K/A Sealed 2, A/K/A Joe Martin, A/K/A Joe Boy, and Regina PierceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- John Fountain, Also Known as Chick v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- United States v. GottiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- UNITED STATES v. WADE THOMAS, —Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.