Legal Opinion

Franklin v. Marie Antoinette Condominium Owners Ass'n

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 25, 1993No. B064293PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ORTEGA, J.

This appeal concerns an exculpatory clause contained in the declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions (CC&R’s) governing the relationship between an association of condominium homeowners and the condominium owners. If applied to this case, the exculpatory clause will relieve the association of its contractual liability to pay the plaintiff condominium owner for water damage to her unit caused by a central plumbing leak. We reverse the judgment with directions to enter judgment for the defendant association.

I

Facts and Procedural Background

The condominium project,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Tunkl v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Westlake Community Hospital v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Frances T. v. Village Green Owners Assn.California Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Appalachian Insurance v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1989
  5. Henrioulle v. Marin Ventures, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1978

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Pinnacle Museum Tower Ass'n v. Pinnacle Market Development (US), LLCCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Chee v. Amanda Goldt Property ManagementCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  3. Villa Milano Homeowners Ass'n v. Il DavorgeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  4. Dillingham-Ray Wilson v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  5. Treo @ Kettner Homeowners Ass'n v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API