Legal Opinion

Finley v. Curley

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided June 20, 1989No. 8977-1-IIIPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShields, J.

Alfred Lee Finley brought this action against James R. Curley to enforce a stock purchase and escrow agreement for 50 percent of the common stock of Equipment Service and Parts, Inc. (ESP). He also sought injunctive relief and sanctions against Mr. Curley and ESP for alleged violations of his rights as a shareholder. After trial, the court concluded Mr. Finley had not paid the consideration required by the stock escrow agreement, was not a shareholder, and no shareholder rights existed. Mr. Finley's appeal presents three questions: (1) Did Mr. Curley wrongfully terminate the stock escrow…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Haberman v. Washington Public Power Supply SystemWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Miller v. BadgleyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1988
  3. Higgins v. EgbertWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Robinson v. HillWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Clark v. CampbellUtah Supreme Court · 1901

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Graves v. Vaagen Bros. Lumber, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1989
  2. VEHICLE/VESSEL LLC, DRA v. Whitman CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  3. Vehicle/Vessel, L.L.C. v. Whitman CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API