Legal Opinion

Higgins v. Egbert

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 3, 1947No. 30157PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteinert, J.

Plaintiff brought suit to recover a real estate broker’s commission. A trial before the court, without a jury, resulted in findings of fact, conclusions of law, and judgment in favor of plaintiff. The defendant appealed.

Respondent, Harold H. Higgins, was a licensed real estate broker at Hartline, Washington, about ninety miles distant from Spokane. Appellant, Maud Egbert, a widow living in Spokane, owned one hundred sixty acres of farm land near Marlin, approximately forty-five miles southeast of Hartline.

On February 18, 1946, respondent called on appellant at her home for the purpose of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Herrin v. Scandinavian-American BankWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Lasswell v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Multicare Medical Center v. Department of Social & Health ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Ebling v. Gove's Cove, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1983
  3. Saletic v. StamnesWashington Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Flower v. T.R.A. Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2005
  5. Cook v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1950

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API