Alliance for the Wild Rockies v. Austin
District Court, D. Montana
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DANA L. CHRISTENSEN, Chief Judge.
Before the Court are the parties cross-motions for summary judgment. For the reasons explained below, the Court grants Defendants’ motion and denies Plaintiffs motion.
Background
Plaintiff challenges Defendants’ approval of the Rennie Stark Project (“the Project”) under the National Environmental Policy Act (“NEPA”), 42 U.S.C. § 4331 et seq., the National Forest Management Act (“NFMA”), 16 U.S.C. § 1604 et seq., the Endangered Species Act (“ESA”), 16 U.S.C. § 1531 et seq., and the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”), 5 U.S.C. § 701 et seq. Plaintiff seeks…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Robertson v. Methow Valley Citizens CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- The Lands Council v. McNairCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Alliance for the Wild Rockies v. United States Forest ServiceDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2023
- Swan View Coalition v. WeberDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2014