Legal Opinion

Alliance for the Wild Rockies v. Austin

District Court, D. Montana

Decided October 28, 2014No. CV 13-168-M-DLCPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

DANA L. CHRISTENSEN, Chief Judge.

Before the Court are the parties cross-motions for summary judgment. For the reasons explained below, the Court grants Defendants’ motion and denies Plaintiffs motion.

Background

Plaintiff challenges Defendants’ approval of the Rennie Stark Project (“the Project”) under the National Environmental Policy Act (“NEPA”), 42 U.S.C. § 4331 et seq., the National Forest Management Act (“NFMA”), 16 U.S.C. § 1604 et seq., the Endangered Species Act (“ESA”), 16 U.S.C. § 1531 et seq., and the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”), 5 U.S.C. § 701 et seq. Plaintiff seeks…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  3. Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Robertson v. Methow Valley Citizens CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. The Lands Council v. McNairCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Alliance for the Wild Rockies v. United States Forest ServiceDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2023
  2. Swan View Coalition v. WeberDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API