Legal Opinion

Swan View Coalition v. Weber

District Court, D. Montana

Decided December 8, 2014No. CV 13-129-M-DWMPublished

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

DONALD W. MOLLOY, District Judge.

Defendants have moved pursuant to Rule 59(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for clarification of this Court’s Judgment and Order of September 25, 2014, (Docs. 51 and 52), which granted in part and denied in part the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. For the reasons discussed below, Defendants’ motion (Doc. 66) is granted in part and denied in part.

Pursuant to Rule 59(e), a court may alter or amend its judgment upon the mo*1161tion by a party. Such a motion may be granted if the court is presented with newly discovered evidence, if the court…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Charles E. McDowell Jr. v. Arthur Calderon, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  2. Zimmerman v. City of OaklandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  3. Birdsong v. WrotenberyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
  4. Capacchione ex rel. Capacchione v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg SchoolsDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1999
  5. Seattle Audubon Society v. MoseleyDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API