Legal Opinion
Bernardi Greater Shows, Inc. v. Boston & Maine Railroad
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided February 7, 1933PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBranch, J.
1. It is plain that the provisions of the contract here involved furnish no answer to some of the allegations in the declarations of the plaintiffs, and that the broad question reserved by the superior court must therefore be answered in the negative. It is alleged that the defendant undertook to keep the cars of the show company in a fit and safe state of repair through its regular and customary system of inspection and repair and made a charge against the show company for this service, but that the inspection was negligently performed and that this negligence contributed to cause the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Adams Express Company v. CroningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Railroad Co. v. LockwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. HarrimanSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railway Co. v. VoigtSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Co. v. RankinSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co. v. DavenportCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953
- Ensco, Inc. v. Weicker Transfer & Storage Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1982
- Sasinowski v. Boston & M. R. R.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1935
- Ensco, Inc., and Cross-Appellee v. Weicker Transfer and Storage Co., and Third-Party v. Warren Jaycox v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, Third Party Appellee-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- Brignoli v. Seaboard Transportation Co.California Supreme Court · 1947
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.