Legal Opinion · Dissent

Brignoli v. Seaboard Transportation Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided March 14, 1947No. Sac. 5805Published

1DissentTraynor, J.

I dissent.

The problem whether a carrier is a common carrier involves questions of fact and of law. It is for the jury to determine what the facts are; whether the facts establish that a carrier is a common carrier is a question of law for the court. If there is conflicting evidence as to the relationship between the parties, the court must instruct the jury as to the operative facts that legally fix the status of common carrier and private carrier and instruct them that if they find the existence of certain facts they must find that the carrier is a common carrier, but if they find the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Railroad Co. v. LockwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  2. Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railway Co. v. VoigtSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  3. Santa Fe, Prescott & Phœnix Railway Co. v. Grant Bros. Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
  4. Bank of Kentucky v. Adams Express Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1876
  5. Northern Pacific R. Co. v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1904

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API