Fain v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
OSBORN, Justice.
This is an appeal from a Conviction for aggravated rape in which the jury found two enhancement counts to be true. Punishment was assessed at life imprisonment. We reform and affirm.
Grounds of Error Nos. Six and Seven challenge the sufficiency of the evidence to prove Appellant’s identity as the defendant in the prior conviction alleged in the third count of the indictment and demonstrated by the penitentiary packet introduced as State’s Exhibit No. Three. Since the admissibility and contents of this exhibit have a bearing on the first five numbered grounds of error, we…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Cumbie v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Watson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
- Daniel v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Coleman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Bradford v. Vento, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1999
- Fain v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Lancaster v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987
- Glenn v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)1989
- Bradford v. Vento, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1999
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.