Legal Opinion
Bradford v. Vento
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
Decided August 12, 1999No. 13-97-116-CVPublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Justice YÁÑEZ
delivered the opinion of the Court,
in which Justices HINOJOSA, CHAVEZ, and RODRIGUEZ joined.
Our opinion in this case dated May 6, 1999 was withdrawn by order of this Court on May 27, 1999. We now substitute this opinion in its place.
Appellants Bruce Bradford, Simon Property Group (“Simon”), and Golden Ring Mall Company (“Golden”) challenge the legal and factual sufficiency of the evidence in support of a jury verdict in favor of appellees Roell and Debra Vento (“the Ventos”). The jury found (1) Tom Taylor, Bradford, Simon, and Golden hable for civil conspiracy and fraud;…
2Cases cited63 opinions
- Formosa Plastics Corp. USA v. Presidio Engineers and Contractors, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
- Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. HaslipSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Sterner v. Marathon Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1989
- Ortiz v. JonesTexas Supreme Court · 1996
- Holt Atherton Industries, Inc. v. HeineTexas Supreme Court · 1992
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Bradford v. VentoTexas Supreme Court · 2001
- Hamilton v. Segue Software Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. SturgesTexas Supreme Court · 2001
- Lesikar v. Rappeport, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2000
- Tompkins v. CyrCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.