Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Williamson v. Cuyahoga County Board of Elections

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 1984No. 84-519PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

We must first decide whether the votes cast for Lambros at the November 8, 1983 election may be counted. In Spangler, supra, we held that Lambros was not an eligible candidate at the time of the election. The temporary restraining order issued by the United States District Court was ultimately dissolved and therefore has no effect on the Spangler ruling. Thus, the only eligible candidate on the ballot was relator and only his votes may be counted.

We reject as unfounded the Secretary of State’s contention that Williamson must have received a greater number of votes than Lambros in order to win…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Halak v. CebulaOhio Supreme Court · 1977
  2. State Ex Rel. Haff v. PaskOhio Supreme Court · 1933
  3. State ex rel. Halak v. SkorepaOhio Supreme Court · 1983

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Arthur P. Lambros v. Cuyahoga County Board of Elections State of Ohio Sherrod BrownCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
  2. State Ex Rel. Taylor v. Lucas County Board of ElectionsOhio Court of Appeals · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API