State ex rel. Halak v. Cebula
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
Ordinarily, an action in quo warranto against a public official, inquiring by what, authority the individual holds his office, must be brought by the Attorney General or a prosecuting attorney. An exception is provided in R. C. 2733.06 which states:
“A person claiming to be entitled to a public office unlawfully held and exercised by another may bring an action therefor by himself or an attorney at law, upon giving security for costs.” . .
It has long been held and accepted that a private person cannot maintan an action in quo warranto except-under the authority of this statute, and “he must…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Lindley v. MacCabeesOhio Supreme Court · 1924
- State Ex Rel. Haff v. PaskOhio Supreme Court · 1933
- State Ex Rel. Smith v. NazorOhio Supreme Court · 1939
3Cited by25 opinions
- State ex rel. Hanley v. RobertsOhio Supreme Court · 1985
- Stahl v. ShoemakerOhio Supreme Court · 1977
- State ex rel. Delph v. BarrOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- State ex rel. Randles v. HillOhio Supreme Court · 1993
- The State Ex Rel. Flanagan v. Lucas, SheriffOhio Supreme Court · 2014
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.