Chaklos v. Stevens
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge.
When Richard Chaklos and Andrew Wist discovered that the State of Illinois was going to pay an out-of-state organization $750,000 to train forensic scientists without first soliciting competitive bids, they decided to take action and try to save the taxpayers some money. They submitted a letter protesting the State’s decision not to solicit bids and proposing to provide the same training services for a lower price through their own company. At the time, however, the State employed Chak-los and Wist to train forensic scientists. (They had formed their training company…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Connick Ex Rel. Parish of Orleans v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by95 opinions
- Narducci v. MooreCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- Fairley v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- Singer v. RaemischCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- Turner v. the Saloon, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- Rapid Litigation Management Ltd. v. CellzDirect, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.