Legal Opinion

Chaklos v. Stevens

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided March 30, 2009No. 07-3444PublishedCited by 95 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge.

When Richard Chaklos and Andrew Wist discovered that the State of Illinois was going to pay an out-of-state organization $750,000 to train forensic scientists without first soliciting competitive bids, they decided to take action and try to save the taxpayers some money. They submitted a letter protesting the State’s decision not to solicit bids and proposing to provide the same training services for a lower price through their own company. At the time, however, the State employed Chak-los and Wist to train forensic scientists. (They had formed their training company…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  3. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Connick Ex Rel. Parish of Orleans v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by95 opinions

  1. Narducci v. MooreCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
  2. Fairley v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
  3. Singer v. RaemischCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  4. Turner v. the Saloon, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  5. Rapid Litigation Management Ltd. v. CellzDirect, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016

90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API