Legal Opinion
DiPeppe v. Quarantillo
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided July 28, 2003No. 01-4043, 01-4096PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
McKEE, Circuit Judge.
The Immigration and Naturalization Service appeals the district court’s determination that § 212(h) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”) 1 violates the equal protection component of the 5th Amendment’s Due Process Clause. In her cross-appeal, Rita Dipeppe challenges the District Court’s ruling that she is not entitled to seek relief from removal under INA § 212(c). 2 For the reasons that follow, we will reverse the District Court’s order as to § 212(h) and affirm it as to § 212(c).
I. INA §§ 212(h) AND 212(c)
INA § 212(h) previously gave the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. St. CyrSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- In Re Murchison.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Reno v. American-Arab Anti-Discrimination CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Offutt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Olufemi Yussef Abdulai v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Goran Mudric v. Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
- Marco Garcia-Echaverria v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Jawdat Elia v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- Dipeppe v. QuarantilloCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
- Jawdat Elia v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.