Legal Opinion
Hoagburg v. Harrah's Marina Hotel Casino
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided April 30, 1984No. Civ. A. 82-2140PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COHEN, Senior District Judge:
Plaintiffs, Frank Hoagburg and Janet Hoagburg, his wife, seek compensatory and punitive damages, as set forth in the ten counts of their complaint, for the following acts allegedly committed by the defendant, Harrah’s Marine Hotel Casino (Harrah’s), located in Atlantic City, New Jersey, against Mrs. Hoagburg: negligence, assault and battery, false arrest, defamation, breach of contract, outrageous conduct per se and unlawful violation of her rights. Mr. Hoagburg sues per quod for loss of his wife’s services and consortium.
Presently before the Court are the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Burdeau v. McDowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Marsh v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Lloyd Corp. v. TannerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Romaine v. KallingerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
- Fineman v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1991
- McDonald's Corp. v. American Motorists InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001
- Karnell v. CampbellNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
- Schiavone Construction Co. v. Time, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1985
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.