Legal Opinion

State v. Gregory

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 2006No. 71155-1Published

1Concurrence · SandersSanders, J.

(concurring in result) — While I agree with the majority’s result, I disagree with its reasoning and *868analysis regarding the jury instruction on consent as well as application of the rape shield law to the facts of this case.

I. Jury Instruction Improperly Shifts Burden to Defendant To Prove Consent

¶194 Although the jury in a first degree rape case must be convinced beyond a reasonable doubt that sexual intercourse occurred as the result of forcible compulsion, RCW 9A.44.050(l)(a), i.e., “physical force which overcomes resistance, or a threat, express or implied, that places a person in fear of…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Fairhurst.

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Rock v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Holmes v. South CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 2006

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API