Legal Opinion
Dennehy v. City of Gresham
Oregon Tax Court
Decided April 16, 1992No. TC 3175PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CARL N. BYERS, Judge.
Petitioners are interested taxpayers seeking determination of the effect of Article XI, section lib, of the Oregon Constitution on respondent’s storm drainage ordinance. This court has jurisdiction under ORS 305.583 and 305.410. Since the petition raises only legal questions, both parties have filed motions for summary judgment.
THE ORDINANCE
On July 17, 1990, respondent enacted ordinance No. 1186, pertaining to storm drainage systems. The ordinance expressly finds that a storm drainage system is needed for developed areas. It imposes a storm drainage system development…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Deras v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 1975
- Gilbert v. Hoisting & Portable Engineers, Local Union No. 701Oregon Supreme Court · 1964
- Dennehy v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- Dennehy v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 1989
- Umrein v. HeimbignerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Dennehy v. City of GreshamOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- City of Lewiston v. GLADUSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2012
- Barlow-Gresham Union High School District No. U2-20 JT. v. City of GreshamOregon Tax Court · 1994
- Multnomah County v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 1995
- Roseburg School District v. City of RoseburgOregon Tax Court · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.