Umrein v. Heimbigner
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtWarren, J.
This proceeding was brought by plaintiffs pursuant to the Uniform Declaratory Judgments Act (ORS Chapter 28) and was treated by the trial court as an equitable proceeding. Plaintiffs sought a declaration that they were entitled to have certain initiative petitions filed, to attorney fees and to "other equitable relief.” Plaintiffs obtained the declaratory relief sought, but were denied attorney fees. They appeal from that ruling. Defendants cross-appeal, challenging the trial court’s decision on the merits. Plaintiffs contend the cross-appeal is moot because the five initiative petitions were…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Deras v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 1975
- Application of Portland General Elec. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1977
- Milwaukie Co. of Jehovah's Witnesses v. MullenOregon Supreme Court · 1958
- Bienz v. City of DaytonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
- Gilbert v. Hoisting & Portable Engineers, Local Union No. 701Oregon Supreme Court · 1964
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Utahns for Better Dental Health-Davis, Inc. v. Davis County ClerkUtah Supreme Court · 2007
- State Ex Rel. Pend-Air Citizen's Committee v. City of PendletonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- Dennehy v. City of GreshamOregon Tax Court · 1992
- State Ex Rel. Eckles v. LivermoreCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
- Koon v. City of GreshamCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.