Legal Opinion
Kincaid & King Construction Co. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 21, 1962No. 16519PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
HAMLIN, Circuit Judge.
An action under the Miller Act, 40 U.S. C.A. §§ 270a-270d, was filed in the United States District Court for the Territory of Alaska by the United States for the use of William Olday, appellee herein, against Kincaid & King Construction Company and others for moneys alleged to be due to Olday as a subcontractor of Kincaid & King, the general contractor. Kincaid & King filed an answer denying the allegations of the complaint and a counterclaim (erroneously designated below as a cross-complaint) seeking damages from Olday by reason of alleged breaches of Olday’s…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Republic of China v. American Express Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
- Winsor v. DaumitCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1950
- Etten v. KauffmanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
- Walter W. Johnson Company v. Reconstruction Finance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
- Matanuska Valley Lines, Inc. v. NealCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Kincaid & King Construction Company, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962