Legal Opinion
Halstead v. Motorcycle Safety Foundation, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided October 8, 1999No. 99-CV-2199PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
JOYNER, District Judge.
By way of the motion which is now before us, the Defendant Motorcycle Safety Foundation moves to partially dismiss the Plaintiffs Amended Complaint. For the reasons which follow, the motion shall be granted.
Background
This case arises out of a written contract between the Pennsylvania, Department of Transportation (“PennDot”) and the Motorcycle Safety Foundation (“MSF”), a private corporation, pursuant to which MSF would conduct and oversee a Motorcycle Safety Program for PennDot. Mr. Hal-stead contends that his name, personal qualifications and…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Rizzo v. GoodeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Gomez v. ToledoSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Flagg Bros., Inc. v. BrooksSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Edmonson v. Leesville Concrete Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Braun v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Miller v. Thomas Jefferson University HospitalDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
- Shafer Electric & Construction v. MantiaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Oxner v. Cliveden Nursing & Rehabilitation Center PA, L.P.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
- Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. GemmaDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.