Legal Opinion

United States of America, Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Charles L. Jackson, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided June 30, 2003No. Docket 02-1283, 02-1303PublishedCited by 155 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McLAUGHLIN, Circuit Judge.

This appeal presents two significant issues: (1) whether statements, made by a co-conspirator at his plea allocution, that arguably exculpate the defendant are admissible at the defendant’s trial; and (2) whether a jury determination as to the quantity of cocaine attributable to the defendant’s conspiracy was supported by the trial evidence.

After a trial in the United States District Court for the Western District of New York (Larimer, /.), a jury found defendant Charles L. Jackson guilty of conspiring to import 5 kilograms or more of cocaine into the United States.…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Williamson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Mitchell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. United States v. Ramse ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by155 opinions

  1. United States v. RigasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
  2. United States v. RomanoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
  3. United States v. Jose D. FlorezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  4. Lipton v. County of Orange, NYDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
  5. United States v. Christian PaulinoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006

150 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API