Legal Opinion

Wheeler v. Berry

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 1893PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error to Wayne. (Gartner, J.) Negligence case. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.

Defendants were manufacturers of heaters and gas machines. In their factory was a carpenter’s shopj which contained two small circular saws, run by machinery, and other tools and machines. In this shop they made parts of the gas machines, and crates used for shipping them. Plaintiff was about 50 years of age, and in the full possession of his faculties. He was employed by defendants as a general laborer at $1.50 per day. At the time of the accident he had been’ in their employ a year and a half. The circular saws projected a few inches above an *252adjustable table, and were 'used for sawing…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. BayfieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Kean v. Detroit Copper & Brass Rolling MillsMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Broderick v. Detroit Union Railroad Station & Depot Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Prentiss v. Kent Furniture Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1886

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Swick v. Ætna Portland Cement Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Hayball v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Rohrabacher v. WoodardMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Soderstrom v. Holland-Emery Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Fischer v. GoldieMichigan Supreme Court · 1903

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API