Legal Opinion

Fischer v. Goldie

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1903No. Docket No. 42PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Bay; Shepard, J. Case by William Fischer against William Goldie for personal injuries. From a judgment for defendant on verdict directed by the court, plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

The plaintiff, a young man, 26 years -of age, was employed by the defendant in planing hoops on a planer constructed especially for that purpose. The machine was kept in repair by a millwright. The base of the machine was made of two cast-iron side frames about 36 inches high and about 8 feet long. A general outline of the top of the machine was that of the top of a table. This top was covered- with brass plates, upon which the material would work easily. There were three sets of rollers, two rollers in each set; the first set called the “feed” rollers, the second set the “receiving” rollers,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lamotte v. BoyceMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Hayball v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Wheeler v. BerryMichigan Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Goga v. American Car & Foundry Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Wilson v. Escanaba Woodenware Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Lukovski v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Lapier v. Beaubien Ice & Coal Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API