Doe ex dem. Lamar v. Roe
Supreme Court of Georgia
Ejectment. Deed. Recitals. Evidence. Statute of limitations. Prescription. Minors. Before Judge Harree. Terrell Superior Court. May Term, 1872. *For the facts of this case, see the decision. The defendants did not claim under Delay and had no right to complain. Code, sections 2520, 3732, 3733; 11 Ga. R., 460; Ibid., 520; 8 Ga. R., 12 Ga. R., 52.
1Opinion of the Court
Warner, Chief Justice.
The plaintiff brought an action of ejectment on the several demises of the heirs-at-law of James Delay, and the heirs-at-law of Andrew Lamar, against the defendants to recover the possession of a lot of land in the county of Terrell. On the trial, the jury found a verdict for the defendants. A motion was made for a new trial, on the grounds set forth in the record, which was overruled by the Court, and the plaintiff excepted. The plaintiff introduced a grant from the State to James Delay for the lot of land in dispute. The plaintiff then offered in evidence a deed made…
2Cited by12 opinions
- Bell v. StuddardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1965
- Cruger v. TuckerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1882
- Rollins v. DavisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
- Wells v. BlitchSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
- Dickey v. GriceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.