Legal Opinion
Bell v. Studdard
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided March 16, 1965No. 22841PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Mobley, Justice.
Plaintiff’s contention that the judgment overruling the demurrers should be sustained because the pleadings were confused and the defendant should have repleaded rather than merely renewed his demurrers is without merit. The defendants renewed their demurrers to the petition as amended after each amendment, which was sufficient. .
The issue presents itself as to whether the zoning ordinance relied upon by the plaintiffs is unconstitutional and therefore invalid and of no effect. It is contended that the ordinance is invalid because it violates Art. I, Sec. I, Par. II (Code §…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Coldwell Co. v. CowartSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
- Hughes v. CobbSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
- Robitzsch v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
- Rieves v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
- Sikes v. PierceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1956
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Glennon Heights, Inc. v. Central Bank & TrustSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
- American Viking Contractors, Inc. v. Scribner Equipment Co., Inc., Scribner Equipment Co., Inc. v. Henry F. NelsonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
- City of Warner Robins v. RushingSupreme Court of Georgia · 1989
- Gainesville Glass Co. v. Don Hammond, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
- Cohn Communities, Inc. v. Clayton CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1987
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.