Legal Opinion

Fechner v. Case

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 9, 2003No. NonePublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TIMM, Circuit Judge.

[¶ 1.] When Paul Case (Case) stopped his Lincoln Town Car in the middle of a Rapid City intersection, blocking the path of Benjamin Fechner’s (Fechner) Suzuki Esteem, Fechner slammed on the brakes. His Esteem skidded twenty feet, coming to a halt just short of the Town Car’s passenger side. Neither vehicle was damaged.

[¶ 2.] Fechner sued Case claiming personal injury and related damages. Case admitted negligence, but denied causing Fechner injury. The jury returned a verdict for Case. Fechner appeals. We affirm.

[¶ 3.] Fechner contends the trial court abused its discretion…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. State v. SchiebelOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  2. People v. CoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  3. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  4. People v. MansonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  5. Nugent v. QuamSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1967

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. BeckSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Duda v. Phatty McGees, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Thompson v. MehlhaffSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Christenson v. BergesonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State v. ReyesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API