State v. Connarn
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtBillings, J.
This is an appeal by the defendant-appellant from a conviction, after trial by jury, of selling for consideration the regulated drug, phencyclidine. 18 V.S.A. § 4224(g). The defendant alleges as error that (1) the delayed disclosure of a witness denied him the rights to pretrial discovery and a. fair trial; (2) the State failed to introduce evidence to show the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt; (3) the drug-exhibit should have been excluded since a sufficient chain of custody was not shown; and (4) the Department of Health regulations designating phencyclidine as a regulated drug…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. HoweSupreme Court of Vermont · 1978
- State v. BishopSupreme Court of Vermont · 1969
- State v. BlakeneySupreme Court of Vermont · 1979
- State v. JacksonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1968
- State v. RossSupreme Court of Vermont · 1972
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. StreichSupreme Court of Vermont · 1995
- State v. MoranSupreme Court of Vermont · 1982
- State v. LombardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1985
- State v. SavoSupreme Court of Vermont · 1982
- State v. MuscariSupreme Court of Vermont · 2002
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.