Legal Opinion
State v. Ross
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided April 4, 1972No. 72-71PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKeyser, J.
The defendant was convicted of operating a motor vehicle on a public highway while under the influence of intoxicating liquor after a jury trial in the Windham Circuit of the Vermont District Court. Defendant’s appeal raises two issues.
“1. Was the defendant denied a fair and impartial trial because of certain remarks made by the state’s attorney in his rebuttal argument to the jury?
2. Did the court err in admitting the result of the chemical analysis of defendant’s urine sample ?”
The state’s attorney made three statements in his rebuttal argument which the defendant claims were prejudicial…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Patterson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1968
- State v. CoburnIdaho Supreme Court · 1960
- State v. AugerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1963
- State v. MichaelWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1955
- State v. FornierSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1961
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- King v. GorczykSupreme Court of Vermont · 2003
- State v. AyersSupreme Court of Vermont · 1987
- Turner v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975
- State v. NortonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1976
- State v. FoySupreme Court of Vermont · 1984
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.