Legal Opinion
State v. Lombard
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided December 6, 1985No. 84-276PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.
Defendant, Allen Lombard, was convicted after a trial by jury of operating under the influence of intoxicating liquor in violation of 23 V.S.A. § 1201(a)(2). He argues on appeal that his conviction should be reversed because (1) the trial court erred in its instructions to the jury; (2) the State violated his constitu tional and statutory rights to counsel; (3) the State failed to disclose the identity of witnesses before trial; and (4) field sobriety tests were administered in violation of his Fifth Amendment rights. We reject these arguments and affirm.
On January 29, 1984, defendant was…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Kirby v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- State v. NewtonOregon Supreme Court · 1981
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- State v. WestSupreme Court of Vermont · 1988
- Pfeil v. Rutland District CourtSupreme Court of Vermont · 1986
- State v. FullerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1995
- City of Mandan v. JewettNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. SchmittSupreme Court of Vermont · 1988
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.