Legal Opinion

McKay Co. v. Logan Co.

District Court, W.D. Kentucky

Decided July 16, 1936No. 919PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAMILTON, District Judge.

This is a suit against the Logan Company for the alleged infringement of structural patent No. 1,959,032, issued May 15, 1934, by the United States Patent Office to William R. McGowen, assignor to plaintiff, the McKay Company, and of design patent No. 91,997, issued April 14, 1934, to Percival Goodman, assignor to the McKay Company.

After notice to the defendant of its alleged infringement, the bill of complaint was filed March 4, 1935.

The plaintiff is a Pennsylvania corporation, and is the owner of the patents in suit, and engaged in the business of manufacturing and…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. The Barbed Wire PatentSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Eibel Process Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. Gorham Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  4. Diamond Rubber Co. of New York v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  5. MacHine Co. v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1878

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McKay Co. v. Shott Mfg. Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1937
  2. Swank Products, Inc. v. SilvermanDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API