Legal Opinion

People v. St. John

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 28, 1930No. Docket No. 164PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcLUCAS, P. J.

The defendant was charged with violation of a city ordinance of South Gate by distributing or throwing upon private porches in said city, a notice of commercial advertising, to wit, “The Down Town Shopping News,” and was adjudged guilty. Defendant appeals from the judgment.

It was stipulated at the trial by plaintiff and defendant that their respective witnesses, if called, would by their testimony establish the following facts: That the “Los Angeles Down Town Shopping News” is a publication issued and published twice each week, and is composed of advertisements inserted by reputable firms and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Soon Hing v. CrowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. Matter of Application of MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  3. In Re CardinalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Ex Parte DrexelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Frost v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In Re PorterfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Serve Yourself Gasoline Stations Ass'n v. BrockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Commonwealth v. KimballMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  4. Slater v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1949
  5. In re MaresCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API