Legal Opinion
Koehler v. DRT Sportservice, Inc.
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided September 24, 1974No. Docket 16601, 16881-16883, 18600PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.
Five separate cases arising out of a single automobile accident are consolidated in this appeal. Each suit was filed against three named tavern establishments under the dramshop act, MCLA 436.22; MSA 18.993, and all were heard by the same trial judge who in each case granted defendant tavern operators’ motion for summary judgment.
Succinctly stated, the facts alleged in the respective bills of complaint and as they appear in the settled record on appeal, are as follows: On the evening of July 16, 1971, Harry D. Rutherford visited the DRT Sportservice, Inc., establishment where he consumed…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Connelly v. Paul Ruddy's Equipment Repair & Service Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1972
- Lahti v. FosterlingMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
- Hansen-Snyder Co. v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1963
- Wiebe v. SeelyOregon Supreme Court · 1959
- Spicer v. Benefit Ass'n of Railway EmployeesOregon Supreme Court · 1933
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Scholten v. RhoadesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
- Thorp v. Casey's General Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1989
- Matson v. SoronenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
- Salas v. ClementsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
- Matson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuraneMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.