Legal Opinion

Kannenberg v. City of Alpena

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1893PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to Alpena. (Kelley, J.) Negligence case. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Hooker, 0. J.

Plaintiff brought an action against defendant to recover damages for a personal injury, occasioned by slipping down upon the ice on a highway. It is contended by defendant's counsel that the evidence conclusively shows that the plaintiff was not upon the sidewalk when he slipped. No witness swears clearly that he slipped upon the sidewalk, but the plaintiff stated once in his testimony that he was on the sidewalk when he fell. We shall therefore treat the question as one for the jury.

The trial judge directed a verdict for defendant upon the ground that there was no evidence that…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Gavett v. City of JacksonMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Miller v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Hutchinson v. City of YpsilantiMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Jaegar v. City of NewportCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
  5. Jefferson v. City of Sault Ste. MarieMichigan Supreme Court · 1911

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API