Legal Opinion

Jefferson v. City of Sault Ste. Marie

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1911No. Docket No. 79PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to Chippewa; Steere, J. Case by Helen Jefferson against the city of Sault Ste. Marie for personal injuries. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

The plaintiff slipped and fell on an icy sidewalk in the city of Sault Ste. Marie, thereby breaking a leg. She has recovered a judgment for $700 against the city, which has appealed.

The negligence charged is: First. That the city was negligent in allowing a ridge of snow to remain in the center of the walk as an alleged result of cleaning the walk with a snowplow. Second. In permitting ice to form upon said walk and ridge as a result of water dropping upon it from a 10-inch wooden projection on the face of an adjacent building from the melting of snow upon it. Sault Ste. Marie is shown to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. McKellar v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Rolf v. City of GreenvilleMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Johnson v. City of MarquetteMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Black v. City of ManisteeMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Gavett v. City of JacksonMichigan Supreme Court · 1896

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hopson v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Berger v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Mayo v. Village of BaragaMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Gorges v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933
  5. Bard v. Weathervane of MichiganMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API