Legal Opinion

Miller v. City of Detroit

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 1909No. Docket No. 82PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Error to Wayne; Murphy, J. Case by John R. Miller against the city of Detroit for personal injuries. There was judgment for defendant on a verdict directed by the court, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

The admitted facts in this cause are that the plaintiff, while walking upon a sidewalk in the city of Detroit, was struck and injured by a dead limb, which fell from a tree over his head. The tree was growing in the public street, between the sidewalk and the curb, and it was admitted by counsel that the limb was 5 inches thick and 15 feet long, and that it had been dead four years. The plaintiff brought this action for damages, alleging negligence. The learned circuit judge directed a verdict for the defendant, and the plaintiff has appealed.

The statutes upon which plaintiff’s right to…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Barnes v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. City of Detroit v. BlackebyMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
  3. Bandfield v. BandfieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  4. McEvoy v. City of Sault Ste. MarieMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Weightman v. Corporation of WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1862

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Board of County Road CommissionersMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Harp v. City of Cleveland HeightsOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Heino v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Harp v. Cleveland Hts.Ohio Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Jablonski v. City of Bay CityMichigan Supreme Court · 1929

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API