Legal Opinion

Wm. Linker Co., Inc. v. Feinberg Et Ux.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 9, 1948No. Appeal, 169PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Jones,

The plaintiff, a contracting company, sued to recover a balance allegedly due by the defendants for alterations and additions made by the plaintiff to a property of the defendants under a written contract and, also, for certain extras under change-orders supplemental to the contract.

In reliance upon Sec. 2 of the arbitration act of 1927, P. L. 381, as amended by Sec. 1 of the Act of June 21, 1935, P. L. 400 (5 PS § 162 Pkt. Part), the defendants petitioned the court,, wherein the suit was pending, to require the plaintiff to submit its claim to arbitration in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bashford v. West Miami Land Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  2. J. S. Cornell & Son, Inc. v. RosenwaldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  3. Margolies v. ZimmermanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Gregg Kendall & Associates, Inc. v. KauhiHawaii Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Formigli Corporation v. Alcar Builders, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1964
  3. Milton Schwartz & Associates, Architects v. Magness Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1974
  4. International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union v. Nazareth Mills Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Northampton County1954
  5. Electrical Switchgear Union v. I-T-E Circuit Breaker Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1964

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API