Legal Opinion
In Re Estate of Stutz
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided February 11, 1964No. 795PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCraweord, J.
Madge W. Bailey and Irvin D. Hangen are the co-administrators with the will annexed of the estate of O. A. Stutz, deceased.
Madge W. Bailey individually claims that the estate owes her $21,140 with interest for services rendered the deceased, and she presented a petition for allowance of the claim. It appears that the necessary procedure was followed in accordance with Sections 2117.01 et seq., Revised Code.
The court, pursuant to Section 2117.03, Revised Code, appointed Floyd D. Smith as an attorney “for the purpose of defending the estate against a claim presented by Madge Bailey for her…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In Re Estate of ShaferOhio Court of Appeals · 1944
- In re Estate of LoganPutnam County Probate Court · 1955
- Reibold v. EvansMontgomery County Probate Court · 1938
- In re SmithPreble County Probate Court · 1952
- Fults v. KinnearHardin County Probate Court · 1939
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Burns v. DailyOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
- Wilhoit v. Estate of PowellOhio Court of Appeals · 1980