Legal Opinion
Reibold v. Evans
Montgomery County Probate Court
Decided December 9, 1938PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By WISEMAN, J.
In case No. 78486-A the court is required to determine whether or not special assessments which nave been paid out of the income of the life tenant should be apportioned between the life tenant and the remaindeimen, and, if so, what portion of said assessment each should bear.
In ease No. 78486-B, the court is required to allocate and adjust- between Winifred Reibold, the life tenant, and the remaindermen, one-fourth of the total attorneys’ fees allowed in a partition c-uit which was amicably settled between the parties without a sale.
The court finds that Louis Reibold…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Chamberlin v. . GleasonNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
- Abend v. Endowment Fund Com. of McKendree CollegeIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
- Cogswell v. WestonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
- Huston v. TribbettsIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
- Reyburn v. WallaceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1887
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Holmes, Trustee v. HrobonOhio Court of Appeals · 1951
- In Re Estate of StutzOhio Court of Appeals · 1964
- Reibold v. EvansOhio Court of Appeals · 1940
- Third National Bank & Trust Co. v. ReiboldOhio Court of Appeals · 1948