Legal Opinion

KEITH KIRKSEY v. ORIENTAL TRADING COMPANY INC.

District Court, D. Nebraska

Decided April 13, 2026No. 8:24-cv-00268Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA KEITH KIRKSEY, Plaintiff, 8:24CV268 v. MEMORANDUM ORIENTAL TRADING COMPANY INC., AND ORDER Defendant. This matter is before the Court on cross-motions for summary judgment filed by plaintiff Keith Kirksey (“Kirksey”) and defendant Oriental Trading Company Inc. (“OTC”). See Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(a); NECivR 56.1. Summary judgment is not “a disfavored procedural shortcut.” Celotex Corp. v. Catrett,

477 U.S. 317, 327

(1986). It is an “integral part” of federal civil procedure designed to prevent “unwarranted consumption” of resources at…

2Cases cited39 opinions

Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
Torgerson v. City of RochesterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
Vance v. Ball State Univ.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.