Chandler v. Waugh
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
MADDOX, Justice.
The major question presented by this appeal is whether the owner of an animal which is running at large on a city street can be held liable in damages for his negligence if the animal causes an automobile accident which produces injury. Appellant contends that state law which requires proof that the owner knowingly or intentionally placed the animal in the street before recovery can be had is applicable only to areas outside cities which have adopted ordinances to prevent animals from running at large. Appellee says that in all cases of automobile accidents involving animals…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Vandiver & Co. v. WallerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1904
- Durden v. BarnettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1844
- Abeles v. BransfieldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
- Baker v. Flint & Pere Marquette RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
- Donoghue v. BunkleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Scott v. DunnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982
- Ex Parte JacksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
- Cabaniss v. CookSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
- Coxwell v. WhatleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
- Brewer v. AtkinsonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2018
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.