Legal Opinion

State v. Cameron

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 24, 1967PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLusk, J.

Defendant appeals from the conviction of receiving and concealing stolen property. Trial was before the court without a jury. Defendant’s sole assignment of error is directed to the court’s denial of his motion for a judgment of acquittal based on the claimed insufficiency of the evidence.

Clear evidence shows that the property described in the indictment as “one Littler blue suit coat and one matching pair of pants” was stolen from the car of the owner of such property, Donald Ferdinand Swanson. Swanson testified that about ten o’clock p.m. on June 15, 1966, he parked his car on State Street…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wertheimer & Goldberg v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1929
  2. State v. LongOregon Supreme Court · 1966

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. NixCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
  2. State v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
  3. State v. MurphyOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  4. State v. SparrowCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API